Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from March 2007
[perl #41354] CGI.pm-3.2.5 make test fails
Thread Previous
From:
Steve Peters via RT
Date:
March 20, 2007 08:39
Subject:
[perl #41354] CGI.pm-3.2.5 make test fails
Message ID:
rt-3.6.HEAD-1687-1174397688-1838.41354-15-0@perl.org
Good news (about CGI, at least). For MySQL, I suggest getting in touch
with the maintainer of DBD::Mysql who is Patrick Galbraith. I've copied
him on this email.
On Tue Mar 20 05:37:44 2007, RARMENTA@trak.com wrote:
>
> Hello Steve,
>
> Looks like CGI.pm 3.27 works fine. The Bundle::Bugzilla still won't
> install though because MySQL module is having problems.
>
> Thanks,
> Robert Armenta
> Software Engineer
> TRAK Microwave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Peters via RT [mailto:perlbug-followup@perl.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 12:49 AM
> To: Armenta, Robert (STRT)
> Subject: [perl #41354] CGI.pm-3.2.5 make test fails
>
> On Fri Jan 26 11:17:05 2007, RARMENTA@trak.com wrote:
> > To: perlbug@perl.org
> > Subject: CGI make test fails
> > Reply-To: rarmenta@trak.com
> > Message-Id: <5.8.0_1042_1169838470@sadhat>
> >
> > This is a bug report for perl from rarmenta@trak.com, generated with
> > the help of perlbug 1.34 running under perl v5.8.0.
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > [Please enter your report here]
> >
> > I tried CGI.pm-3.25 from the Bugzilla::Bundle install and just
> > downloading the tar.gz file from CPAN. This is output of make
> > test.
> >
> > PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e"
> > "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
> > t/apache................ok t/can...................ok
> > t/carp..................ok t/cookie................ok
> > t/fast..................ok
> > 7/7 skipped: various reasons
> > t/form..................ok
> > t/function..............Use of uninitialized value in string eq at
> > t/function.t line 99.
> > FAILED test 23
> > Failed 1/32 tests, 96.88% okay
> > t/html..................ok
> > t/no_tabindex...........ok
> > t/pretty................ok
> > t/push..................ok
> > 1/12 skipped: various reasons
> > t/request...............Use of uninitialized value in string eq at
> > t/request.t line 92.
> > FAILED test 32
> > Failed 1/33 tests, 96.97% okay
> > t/start_end_asterisk....ok
> > t/start_end_end.........ok
> > t/start_end_start.......ok
> > t/switch................ok
> > t/upload................ok
> > t/util-58...............ok
> > t/util..................ok
> > Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail List of Failed
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
> -
> > t/function.t 32 1 23
> > t/request.t 33 1 32
> > 8 subtests skipped.
> > Failed 2/19 test scripts. 2/511 subtests failed.
> > Files=19, Tests=511, 1 wallclock secs ( 1.22 cusr + 0.08 csys =
> > 1.30 CPU)
> > Failed 2/19 test programs. 2/511 subtests failed.
> > make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 29
> >
> >
> >
> This is probably not the place to answer this kind of question, but
> I'll
> try anyway. Are things any better when you try to install CGI.pm-
> 3.27?
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
> ************************************************
> The information contained in, or attached to, this e-mail, may contain
> confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the
> individual or entity to whom they are addressed and may be subject
> to legal privilege. If you have received this e-mail in error you
> should notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail, delete the
> message from your system and notify your system manager. Please do
> not copy it for any purpose, or disclose its contents to any other
> person. The views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely
> those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the
> company. The recipient should check this e-mail and any
> attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no
> liability for any damage caused, directly or indirectly, by any
> virus transmitted in this email.
> ************************************************
>
Thread Previous