Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from March 2007
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 10:20:11AM +0200, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > I'm afraid not. This one was actually found from t/op/subst.t, and > curiously not from a single test case but instead from a combination > of two different test cases. The key *seems* to be a length-growing > s/// followed by an eval of $& AND an assignment of the eval result > to a lexical. But that's just my quick analysis and understanding. > The /g in the s/// is not needed, it seems, so this works equally > "well": I've reported this as bug 41653 Nicholas ClarkThread Previous | Thread Next