Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from February 2007
On 27/02/07, Nicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org> wrote: > 3: There comes a conflict between the quick fix to get a firm moving, and the > best (portable) solution to commit to core. So does one end up supporting > many fragmented perl installations, or instead end up compromising the > core with rushed commits? (that's also apparent when you look at some of the patches linux vendors put in their perls)