develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from February 2007

Re: dual-lived module development (was: RE: $Win32::VERSION problem)

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Tels
Date:
February 27, 2007 15:07
Subject:
Re: dual-lived module development (was: RE: $Win32::VERSION problem)
Message ID:
200702280001.32494@bloodgate.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Moin,

On Tuesday 27 February 2007 22:33:07 Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> Tels wrote:
> > As Dave already stated in the past, the home and primary developmen of
> > dual-lived modules is blead. Putting them on CPAN serves only two
> > purposes:
> >
> > * so people of current stable Perls can get them earlier and not have
> > to wait for the next stable release to get bugfixes and new features *
> > get the into more wide spread testing of CPAN-testers
> >
> > Consider this a bonus. (The alternative is that everybody has to wait
> > for the next stable Perl to get the bugfixes and new features).
>
> Perhaps this is how it actually plays out most of the time, but
> Porting/Contract has a very different take.  In the case under
> consideration, Win32API::File, removing the indirect object syntax
> seemed to me something better done by way of the module owner(s)
> rather than in bleadperl.

Guess I should have read that document - didn't even knew it existed. Which 
somehow really questions my ability to maintain core Perl modules. :) Thanx 
for pointing that out!

Btw, the confusion arises because I considered only modules that are "taken" 
from the core and then "released into the wild" (aka CPANed).

The other way, where a module exists on CPAN first and is then added to the 
core - well, I think there the creator(s) of the module should have a much 
bigger say, which Porting/Contract probably spells out much more elaborate 
then I ever could :-D

Take care,

Tels

- -- 
 Signed on Tue Feb 27 23:58:18 2007 with key 0x93B84C15.
 Get one of my photo posters: http://bloodgate.com/posters
 PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email.

 "Den wahren Wert dieser Software werden vermutlich nur Fach Läute und
 Firmen erkennen."

  -- "So isst es. Ein gewißer Standart muss schon gewart beiben!" --  Kabe 
(http://tinyurl.com/3kucx)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBReTGXHcLPEOTuEwVAQKREQf+IofcUxjrrnZoVqffTZndRHJ8YpVdKqjD
Y2fzURQwT8hZA6ropfHmt9rbAOR1ALPPuVRX2svnetVURPr11OvNPSRHT1nniZ9M
GIvOutS97zrrnoUrSjl01LA+ZaVg/7OvT4C77vU1lpXmITG539qJeotj/mNNPzK6
rv7rWHHy0Zloxlo0goswAwffClVRavcqTuAiDRpokwkV+HLiqCtzeW83FS+HAzM+
ZH3KASbpXHxhjxqEP4ROkjeo8Inz3889U0H09igyZBEL5Qkb3V3vlrMl2OKXBFx7
hkJcC9BuZc7B0eUedF39sztYb8Mhpq7l7Zz3Cs0r1THIbFK7dgFyPg==
=3+or
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About