Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from February 2007
Tels wrote: > As Dave already stated in the past, the home and primary developmen of > dual-lived modules is blead. Putting them on CPAN serves only two > purposes: > > * so people of current stable Perls can get them earlier and not have to > wait for the next stable release to get bugfixes and new features > * get the into more wide spread testing of CPAN-testers > > Consider this a bonus. (The alternative is that everybody has to wait for > the next stable Perl to get the bugfixes and new features). Perhaps this is how it actually plays out most of the time, but Porting/Contract has a very different take. In the case under consideration, Win32API::File, removing the indirect object syntax seemed to me something better done by way of the module owner(s) rather than in bleadperl.Thread Previous | Thread Next