Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from January 2007
Re: New release ?
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
H.Merijn Brand
Date:
January 5, 2007 11:07
Subject:
Re: New release ?
Message ID:
20070105200709.0495f1ac@pc09
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:20:05 +0100, "Rafael Garcia-Suarez"
<rgarciasuarez@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm trying to make a list of what needs to be sorted out before a new
> development release: (5.9.5, which should be feature-equal to 5.10.0)
>
> - 64 bit Linux builds (/lib64) (is more than change #29603 needed?)
I think this'll do.
> - thread unsafeties ?
> - thread leaks ?
> - have we still a leak on /(?{die})/ ? (Dave)
> - more regexp work ? (Yves)
> - C3 MRO ? (Brandon Black)
> - More core modules for CPANPLUS (Jos)
> - CPAN module breakages to fix core-side ?
> - support for Svt_BIND ? (Nicholas)
I have nothing left on *my* TODO list.
I some some recent ramblings on changes to Configure
- adding -X
- initial value of NV_PRESERVES_UV_BITS
If you like, I'll do the -X asap, as there were no objections, and
the approach as discussed was quite sane
As long as no-one explicitly tells me to alter the behaviour regarding
the second item, I will take no action.
There is a minor thing I still have to /check/ in the hpux hints regarding
version reporting of the C compiler, but I think that it was already addressed
--
H.Merijn Brand Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/)
using & porting perl 5.6.2, 5.8.x, 5.9.x on HP-UX 10.20, 11.00, 11.11,
& 11.23, SuSE 10.0 & 10.1, AIX 4.3 & 5.2, and Cygwin. http://qa.perl.org
http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/ http://www.test-smoke.org
http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next