develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from June 2006

Re: Its time we set the score straight on Perl 5 and Perl 6 and debunkour own self-generated FUD.

From:
David Landgren
Date:
June 27, 2006 07:37
Subject:
Re: Its time we set the score straight on Perl 5 and Perl 6 and debunkour own self-generated FUD.
Message ID:
44A14292.1070402@landgren.net
Adam Kennedy wrote:
> David Nicol wrote:

[...]

>> In case all we're looking for is a good name for "What Is Around The 
>> Core,
>> But Still Within The Rind" I propose we continue drawing terms from the
>> world of fruit and call the Greater Core Package "pulp."
> 
> Apparently, I'm scheduled to sit down with Audrey and Larry at the 
> hackfest and discuss this very same issue for Perl 6, including what to 
> call it (Core Level 1, 2, 3, etc being rejected).
> 
> I'll let you know, so we can reuse the terminology.

Calling it fruit doesn't really do it for me. I always thought "core" 
was more metallic than anything else. The Greater Core Package could 
then be a Lattice (that is, a partially ordered set or a group).

David
-- 
Much of the propaganda that passes for news in our own society is given 
to immobilising and pacifying people and diverting them from the idea 
that they can confront power. -- John Pilger




nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About