Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 09:17:35AM +0100, Steve Hay wrote: >> I've been trying to look at all the Win32 patches that come in for quite >> a while now and I don't recall having overruled or ignored any, except >> possibly suggestions for including new (Win32) modules into the core, >> which I don't feel I could unilaterally do without support from others. > > I don't remember these specifically. But also I don't remember any great > debates about "should/shouldn't" include things. Actually, all I could find after a quick look were these comments: http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2003-12/msg00169.html http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2005-02/msg00179.html (Funnily enough, both of these mention Win32API::File, which we have at last reached agreement to include now :-) So it looks like I was mistaken in thinking that there'd been more talk about these things in the past. Sorry. -- ------------------------------------------------ Radan Computational Ltd. The information contained in this message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or there are any problems, please notify the sender immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. Note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Radan Computational Ltd. The recipient(s) of this message should check it and any attached files for viruses: Radan Computational will accept no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.