On 6/22/06, Nicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 04:48:41PM +0200, Mattia Barbon wrote: > > > This is getting rather offtopic for p5p, but... > > when people find that the wxPerl documentation is what it is, they > > usually take the time to complain about it, but so far almost nobody > > has taken the time to actually do anything about it. > > The cynic in me suggests that you're only offtopic because you used the > words "wxPerl documentation" in that sentence. > > Otherwise is rather on-topic for p5p. :-( > > Specifically, there is *nothing* stopping *anyone* from bundling up more > modules, testing that they all work, and shipping a bigger SDK tarball. And > then supporting it. > > Or a host of other ways people propose to improve the core. Working code > talks loudest. > > Such as that timed exit code someone suggested two years ago. Which was a > good idea, but could be done as a module. Last I remember was that he went > off to implement it... > > > Anyone who feels like writing some code -- there are perl-only tasks in > http://mirrors.develooper.com/perl/APC/perl-current/pod/perltodo.pod > looking for champions. =head2 Merge the win32 and wince codebases Can be removed from the TODO list. Yves -- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"