On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 19:04 -0400, Randy W. Sims wrote: > Adam Kennedy wrote: > > Carp... > > > > utf8 > > > > warnings > > > > A few others, but yes, it should look something like that > > > > Level 1 - Perl, strict, Carp, warnings, utf8, a few other small things > > > > Level 2 - Level 1 + whatever is required to have a working CPAN client > > > > Level 3 - Level 2 plus a large number of other common things... > > Is the layered approach sensible past "Level 2" as opposed to grouping > modules by task? Or should there be anything at all past Level 2? The > more sets, the more work to support them. But then, it seems to be much > more reassuring to some users, judging from other posts, to have a > "supported" set of modules. Besides... If we go any deeper we will be eaten by a grue.