Adam Kennedy wrote: > Carp... > > utf8 > > warnings > > A few others, but yes, it should look something like that > > Level 1 - Perl, strict, Carp, warnings, utf8, a few other small things > > Level 2 - Level 1 + whatever is required to have a working CPAN client > > Level 3 - Level 2 plus a large number of other common things... Is the layered approach sensible past "Level 2" as opposed to grouping modules by task? Or should there be anything at all past Level 2? The more sets, the more work to support them. But then, it seems to be much more reassuring to some users, judging from other posts, to have a "supported" set of modules. Randy.