Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from June 2006
> Also moving more commonly used modules into core perl, making the core > perl experience more usable would improve the lot of many, many, many > a perl developer who is limited by policy that they cannot form > dependencies on modules that arent in core. A group that I think is > much larger and IMO much more important than the "minimal core" types > realize. the "minimal core" concept is usually part of a bundle that includes an approval process -- such as what happens to get a CPAN module into the PPMs that come with ActiveState (unless I'm wrong about that) In case all we're looking for is a good name for "What Is Around The Core, But Still Within The Rind" I propose we continue drawing terms from the world of fruit and call the Greater Core Package "pulp." -- David L Nicol "if life were like Opera, this would probably have poison in it" -- Lyric Opera promotional coffee cup sleeve from Latte LandThread Previous | Thread Next