develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from June 2006

Re: Its time we set the score straight on Perl 5 and Perl 6 and debunk our own self-generated FUD.

From:
Chip Salzenberg
Date:
June 19, 2006 18:36
Subject:
Re: Its time we set the score straight on Perl 5 and Perl 6 and debunk our own self-generated FUD.
Message ID:
20060620013629.GG9366@tytlal.topaz.cx
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 12:51:19AM +0200, Abigail wrote:
> New features is what the world uses as a measurement to decide software
> is dead, or being developed.  And they look at what's being developed -
> for J. Random Perl Programmer, all the features currently in blead are
> just vaporware.

You win the thread.  Old software doesn't so much die as creak and grind slowly
to a halt, and that's what's been happening to the users' view of Perl 5 for a
while now.

This is hardly a new observation -- Larry cited it in the "Perl 6"
"announcement" -- but the consequences of its continuing and intensifying truth
seem to have escaped discussion.

If the opening act is bad enough, the audience will leave before the headliner
takes the stage.  And if Perl 5's apparent development rate -- the rate of
feature set evolution -- continues to slow, Perl 5's user base will shrink
severely.  That's as close to death as an immensely popular system like Perl 5
will ever experience.

What's up in the Pascal community these days?
--
Chip Salzenberg <chip@pobox.com>



nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About