develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from June 2006

Re: Its time we set the score straight on Perl 5 and Perl 6 and debunk our own self generated FUD.

From:
Abigail
Date:
June 18, 2006 15:54
Subject:
Re: Its time we set the score straight on Perl 5 and Perl 6 and debunk our own self generated FUD.
Message ID:
20060618224852.GC4149@abigail.nl
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:05:55AM +0200, demerphq wrote:
> Lately I've been seeing comments in various forums along the following 
> lines:
> 
>  1. Perl 5 is a dead language
>  2. Perl 5 is going to be replaced by Perl 6 so there is no point in
> using Perl 5.
> 
> I think these are a serious problem for the language and the
> community. When college teachers are saying that teaching PHP makes
> more sense because Perl is a dead language there is a problem. When

Releasing a new version of Perl5 on average once a year for the first
six years of Perl5, and releasing only one new version of Perl5 (5.8)
since the Perl6 effort started 6 years ago didn't exactly help to
eliminate this notion. Perlhist tells us the following:

    1994    Perl 5.000 released
    1995    Perl 5.001
    1996    Perl 5.002/5.003
    1997    Perl 5.004
    1998    Perl 5.005
    2000    Perl 5.6.0.   Perl6 effort starts.
    2002    Perl 5.8.0.

It's more than four years ago that the last version of Perl5 was released.

If you want a reason why people think Perl5 is dead, look at perl5. Don't
point the finger at Perl6. Four year is for ever in this world.



Abigail



nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About