develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from June 2006

Its time we set the score straight on Perl 5 and Perl 6 and debunk our own self generated FUD.

From:
demerphq
Date:
June 16, 2006 02:06
Subject:
Its time we set the score straight on Perl 5 and Perl 6 and debunk our own self generated FUD.
Message ID:
9b18b3110606160205m238c8925hf300fa925184a39f@mail.gmail.com
Lately I've been seeing comments in various forums along the following lines:

  1. Perl 5 is a dead language
  2. Perl 5 is going to be replaced by Perl 6 so there is no point in
using Perl 5.

I think these are a serious problem for the language and the
community. When college teachers are saying that teaching PHP makes
more sense because Perl is a dead language there is a problem. When
the people who should know better think that Perl 5 is end-of-lifed
because of Perl 6 then there is a problem. When the internal politics
of the Perl community lead to more Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt than a
focused Microsoft attack campaign there is something wrong.

I dont know where else to post this. Maybe there is a better forum
with a wider audience, maybe i should be writing talk proposals for a
YAPC, I dont know. But im frustrated by the whole situation. The  lack
of production worthy deliverables from the Perl 6 project combined
with poor PR is in my opinion causing serious harm to Perl in the
market. We need to counteract this. We need to make it clear to the
market that Perl 5 isnt going anywhere until Perl 6 has proved itself
in a production setting.

We need to make it clear that Perl 5 is not dead, not sleeping, and
not going anywhere.

Or somebody needs to tell me that all of this is wrong and where to go
for Perl 5s funeral.

Yves





-- 
perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"



nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About