On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 13:05:49 +0200, demerphq wrote: > Well i know from experience on other matters that using StrVal for > indexing reference lookups is massively slower than using refaddr. I > just whipped up a benchmark and it shows that refaddr is an order of > magnitude faster than than StrVal. And IMO if you are already dealing > with a piggish interface (ie a tied hash) then you aught to careful > about trimming unnecessary fat elsewhere. Okay, i'm sold... I'll write a quick patch later today when I'm back home unless someone beats me to it. -- Yuval Kogman <nothingmuch@woobling.org> http://nothingmuch.woobling.org 0xEBD27418Thread Previous | Thread Next