Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from January 2005
Dave Mitchell wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:25:01PM +0200, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
>
>>Finding a patch there would have violated several known laws of physics,
>>most importantly it would have involved time travel.
>
>
> Umm, much as I hate being the tider of bad news, with that patch and on a
> -Dusemymalloc build, this code:
>
> for my $index (8114,8119) {
> my $c = chr($index);
> my $a = uc $c;
> }
> warn "exiting\n";
>
>
> outputs:
>
> $ ./perl -Ilib /tmp/a.pl
> exiting
> assertion botched (chunk's tail overwrite?): ((caddr_t)ovp + nbytes - sizeof (unsigned int))[i] == 0x55 (malloc.c:2075)
> Aborted
>
Can I go back to sleep under my rock now, please? It was so quiet and
cool in there...
--
Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi@iki.fi> http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ "There is this special
biologist word we use for 'stable'. It is 'dead'." -- Jack Cohen
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next