develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from January 2005

Re: Smoke [5.8.6] 23856 FAIL(XF) hp-ux 11.11/64 (PA-2.0/32/1 cpu)

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Steve Peters
Date:
January 23, 2005 08:16
Subject:
Re: Smoke [5.8.6] 23856 FAIL(XF) hp-ux 11.11/64 (PA-2.0/32/1 cpu)
Message ID:
20050123161546.GA21251@mccoy.peters.homeunix.org
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 04:14:28PM +0100, Abe Timmerman wrote:
> Op een grimmige winterdag (Sunday 23 January 2005 14:51),schreef  Nicholas 
> Clark:
> > On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 02:45:53PM +0100, Abe Timmerman wrote:
> > > Manual rebuild/rerun:
> > >
> > > ok 65
> > > # make = 'make'
> > >
> > > Stop.
> > > not ok 66 # make failed: 256
> > > # Makefile out-of-date with respect to Makefile.PL
> > > # Cleaning current config before rebuilding Makefile...
> > > #       make -f Makefile.old clean > /dev/null 2>&1 || /bin/sh -c true
> > > #       ../../perl "-I../../../lib" "-I../../../lib" Makefile.PL
> > > "PERL_CORE=1" # Checking if your kit is complete...
> > > # Looks good
> > > # Writing Makefile for ExtTest
> > > # ==> Your Makefile has been rebuilt. <==
> > > # ==> Please rerun the make command.  <==
> > > #       false
> > > # *** Error exit code 1
> > > # ext-15332 being removed...
> > > FAILED tests 66-272
> > >
> > > These are at random places, but always there!
> >
> > Oooh. I wonder if this is the cause on various platforms. I never see this
> > on anything I have access to.
> >
B
> > Could this be timestamp issues with Makefile/Makefile.PL? Is this building
> > on a local file system?
> 
> Yup, this is a local filesystem. Perhaps Merijn can shed some light regarding 
> the type of fs:
> 
> /home on /dev/vg00/lvol5 delaylog,nodatainlog on Sat Sep 25 03:33:08 2004
> 
> >                          I'm assuming that MakeMaker is getting caught out
> > by timestamps not being what we all expect.
> 

As an aside, I've seen these random failures on OpenBSD as well.

Steve Peters
steve@fisharerojo.org
> Anything I can do to help resolve this?
> 
> Good luck,
> 
> Abe
> -- 
> I'm not denying that it isn't a forest, I'm just leery of what will
> fall down if we shake the trees too hard.
>                                    -- Jarkko Hietaniemi on p5p @ 2002-02-12

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About