Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from January 2005
Op een grimmige winterdag (Sunday 23 January 2005 14:51),schreef Nicholas
Clark:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 02:45:53PM +0100, Abe Timmerman wrote:
> > Manual rebuild/rerun:
> >
> > ok 65
> > # make = 'make'
> >
> > Stop.
> > not ok 66 # make failed: 256
> > # Makefile out-of-date with respect to Makefile.PL
> > # Cleaning current config before rebuilding Makefile...
> > # make -f Makefile.old clean > /dev/null 2>&1 || /bin/sh -c true
> > # ../../perl "-I../../../lib" "-I../../../lib" Makefile.PL
> > "PERL_CORE=1" # Checking if your kit is complete...
> > # Looks good
> > # Writing Makefile for ExtTest
> > # ==> Your Makefile has been rebuilt. <==
> > # ==> Please rerun the make command. <==
> > # false
> > # *** Error exit code 1
> > # ext-15332 being removed...
> > FAILED tests 66-272
> >
> > These are at random places, but always there!
>
> Oooh. I wonder if this is the cause on various platforms. I never see this
> on anything I have access to.
>
> Could this be timestamp issues with Makefile/Makefile.PL? Is this building
> on a local file system?
Yup, this is a local filesystem. Perhaps Merijn can shed some light regarding
the type of fs:
/home on /dev/vg00/lvol5 delaylog,nodatainlog on Sat Sep 25 03:33:08 2004
> I'm assuming that MakeMaker is getting caught out
> by timestamps not being what we all expect.
Anything I can do to help resolve this?
Good luck,
Abe
--
I'm not denying that it isn't a forest, I'm just leery of what will
fall down if we shake the trees too hard.
-- Jarkko Hietaniemi on p5p @ 2002-02-12
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next