Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from January 2005
Re: modf chainsaw?
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
Nick Ing-Simmons
Date:
January 3, 2005 09:42
Subject:
Re: modf chainsaw?
Message ID:
20050103174205.1894.13@llama.ing-simmons.net
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes <sthoenna@efn.org> writes:
>On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 06:13:34PM +0100, Rafael Garcia-Suarez <rgarciasuarez@mandrakesoft.com> wrote:
>> H.Merijn Brand wrote:
>> >
>> > /me calls for the 5.6 pumpking: Acme?????
>>
>> I'd prefer to avoid "chainsawing out" modfl from Configure,
>> mostly for sentimental reasons.
>
>I would leave detection of d_modfl, d_modflproto, d_modfl_pow32_bug,
>d_aintl, and d_copysignl in place; just remove the uselongdouble
>restriction. Care to explain your sentimental reasons further?
Well my 2¢
1¢ - it probably took "us" a while to get it right
seem a shame to loose all that knowledge.
1¢ - who knows if some extension is using $Config{d_modfl}
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next