Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from December 2004
Nicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org> wrote: :It looks like this logic is incorrect: : : si = *ary; : a = SvTYPE(ary[1]) == SVt_RV ? &ary[1] : 0; : b = SvTYPE(ary[2]) == SVt_PVAV ? &ary[2] : 0; [...] :Would it be reasonable to replace that SvTYPE check with an SvROK check? Looks reasonable to me. Do you understand what caused the sv to get upgraded to PVMG? The only problems are likely to occur when the sv actually has magic attached, and it gets passed to one of the standard sv.c functions which will attempt to execute code associated with that magic in a non-reentrant fashion. (I better stop waving my arms now, I think I see Don Quixote taking a run up.) HugoThread Previous