Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from December 2004
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 04:01:49PM -0800, Stephen McCamant wrote: > However, I think the best solution is "don't do that, then". B is > intended for looking at the parse tree, which isn't generally in > danger of going away, rather than for examining transient values. It > wouldn't be out of the question to change B so that it always > SvREFCNT_inc'd the SVs it wrapped, but it would be a fairly major > change, with some tricky aspects (for instance, should it try to hide > the increased count from the B::SV:REFCNT method?). Trying to > reference count OPs would be harder, since most of them don't actually > store a reference count. So you probably also shouldn't try to do things like: [http://perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=379395] ? :)Thread Previous | Thread Next