Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from December 2004
Re: perlpodtut
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
Michael G Schwern
Date:
December 25, 2004 12:17
Subject:
Re: perlpodtut
Message ID:
20041225201732.GA5837@windhund.schwern.org
On Fri, Dec 24, 2004 at 01:23:59PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Most importantly, I think it's worth to note that the ordering of
> > sections doesn't matter as long as NAME's the first. I think discussing
> > this can be a waste of time.
>
> This is probably true; I don't think you need to go into an extended
> discussion of it. But it would be nice for the order in Perl's own
> documentation to match the recommended order in pod2man, one way or the
> other.
If I had to make a choice I'd say pod2man should change to reflect current
practise. But I don't think the ordering of those last few sections is
terribly important.
--
Michael G Schwern schwern@pobox.com http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
You're smoother than a tunnel of shining sorrow.
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next