On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 22:47:35 +0100, Dave Mitchell <davem@iabyn.com> wrote: > I'm not sure how this can be construed as a bug. In the general > case I'd expect 'a'..'zzzzzzz' to generate a large list, since P5 doesn't > have P6's lazy lists. It just so happens that C<for (X..Y)> is > special-cased, but I don't see why that should lead to a general > expcatation of lazy-listness? I have high expectations. Call it a feature request if it makes you feel better. I reported it so its in the tracking system if someone wants to take a crack at it.Thread Previous | Thread Next