On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 12:41:21PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: > I've removed the optimisation with change 23093 > Specifically I've disabled the code in op.c that adds the hint, as I believe > that the hint is correct for the case of reverse sort ... Which is now optimised in list context - change 23102 I'm not sure how worthwhile this really is, but I think it means that there's no argument about what's the most efficient way to reverse sort a list - don't write a reversed comparison function, simply write reverse sort .... Nicholas ClarkThread Previous | Thread Next