Quoting Nicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org>: > The disadvantage of PERL_5_10_ISH is that we then have to invent > PERL_5_12_ISH > and so on. > > use more 'future'; > > So some sort of name that isn't version specific but does suggest sneak > preview beta would be my (current) preferred choice. In my mind, being version specific was a "feature" : it will ease migration of a script from 5.8 to 5.10 without having unwanted side-effects it one forgot to remove "use more 'future'". (*) (*) or maybe "use more 'features'" :)Thread Previous | Thread Next