Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from May 2004
Dave Mitchell wrote:
>
> Thinking about this some more; it could be argued that since op.c has already
> gone to the trouble of marking the padsv op with the OPpDEREF flag, that
> its a bug in pp_padsv for then ignoring that flag if it happens also to
> be marked with OPpLVAL_INTRO. That is to say, ($x)->{foo} autovivifies
> but (my $x)->{foo} doesn't. Clearly the OP's patch was wrong because it
> threw out the baby with the bathwater, but maybe something like the
> following (untested):
which is the OP's second version :)
I still don't see why this would be a worthwhile language change. I've
no opinion on this in fact.
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next