Re: my $x->{foo} doesn't work

Dave Mitchell wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 10:47:54AM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
> > Your patch looks correct at a first glance, but I'm not very inclined to
> > apply it, unless the crowd comes up with good reasons why to.
> 
> The patch incorrectly removes introduction:

I stand corrected, thanks!

• my $x->{foo} doesn't work by tetryl
• Re: my $x->{foo} doesn't work by Rafael Garcia-Suarez
• ++(my $x = {}) [Was: Re: my $x->{foo} doesn't work] by Dan Kogai
• Re: ++(my $x = {}) [Was: Re: my $x->{foo} doesn't work] by Dan Kogai
• Re: ++(my $x = {}) [Was: Re: my $x->{foo} doesn't work] by Ronald J Kimball
• Re: ++(my $x = {}) [Was: Re: my $x->{foo} doesn't work] by Ronald J Kimball
• Re: ++(my $x = {}) [Was: Re: my $x->{foo} doesn't work] by Dan Kogai
• Re: my $x->{foo} doesn't work by Shinya Hayakawa
• Re: my $x->{foo} doesn't work by Elizabeth Mattijsen
• Re: my $x->{foo} doesn't work by Dave Mitchell
• Re: my $x->{foo} doesn't work by Rafael Garcia-Suarez
• Re: my $x->{foo} doesn't work by Dave Mitchell
• Re: my $x->{foo} doesn't work by Shinya Hayakawa
• Re: my $x->{foo} doesn't work by hv
• Re: my $x->{foo} doesn't work by Shinya Hayakawa
• Re: my $x->{foo} doesn't work by Dave Mitchell
• Re: my $x->{foo} doesn't work by Rafael Garcia-Suarez