Michael G Schwern wrote: > On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 10:26:16AM -0600, david wrote: > > > I also don't think its wise to start throwing in commented out "just in case > you might need it down the road" modules uses into h2xs templates. How many > modules have never needed more testing? We should throw "# use Carp::Assert" > in there. And people always forget to check their opens so there should be > a "# use Fatal qw(open close)". Pick a pet peeve. Its a slippery slope > that shouldn't be started down. Keep the templates sparse and simple, > throw anything not immediately useful out, so the first time module author > that's going to use them doesn't get confused. > > A perlfaq entry sounds more like the solution to your problem. How about a module-authors BCP document, and a heavy module template that includes stubs for all best current module-authoring practices?Thread Previous | Thread Next