Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from December 2003
Op een winterige herfstdag (Sunday 21 December 2003 00:43), schreef Nicholas
Clark:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 10:30:00PM +0000, steve.hay@uk.radan.com wrote:
> > Automated smoke report for 5.8.2 patch 21930 on MSWin32 - 5.1 Service
> > Pack 1 (x86/1 cpu) (TANGAROA) using cl version 12.00.8804
> > Report by Test::Smoke v1.18.10 (perl 5.8.2) [2 hours 29 minutes]
> >
> > O = OK F = Failure(s), extended report at the bottom
> > X = test(s) failed under TEST but not under harness
> > ? = still running or test results not (yet) available
> > Build failures during: - = unknown or N/A
> > c = Configure, m = make, M = make (after miniperl), t = make test-prep
[snip]
> It's not clear to me why it's failing. (or even exactly what 't' is,
> distinct from an 'M' failure)
Different stage in the process. M (and m) are the result of `make` failing
(with M we have a miniperl executable and run `make minitest`, with m there
is no executable). t is the result of `make test-prep` failing which means
there is a perl executable but there is something else is the way to really
run `make _test`.
I'm afraid we still have to look in the logfile to what is failing.
Good luck,
Abe
--
Adding a -w warning for the "pseudohashes are going away, repent and
give away your all wordly possessions" to 5.8.1 is okay, but what I
don't understand is why Sarathy is thinking people would be using -w
that much more than they would be reading the 5.8.0 announcement? :-)
-- Jarkko Hietaniemi on p5p @ 2002-09-06
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next