Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from November 2003
On Fri 14 Nov 2003 15:49, Rafael Garcia-Suarez <rgarciasuarez@free.fr> wrote: > Craig A. Berry wrote: > > > > The attached patch fixes the two test failures I saw in the release > > candidate. I think vms/ext/filespec.t was just never tested on a case > > preserving file system and would have had the same problem in 5.6.1. > > t/pod/find.t had some VMS-specific hacks that are no longer necessary -- > > probably the newer File::Find obviated them. Both of these tests have more > > extensive revisions in 5.8.x. > > Thanks, applied as #21724 ! > > > Is there an rsync incantation that will fetch the 5.6.2-to-be? My > > understanding is that the usual 5.6.x is a diverging branch at the moment. > > Is that true? > > Yes. 5.6.2 branched from 5.6.1, not from 5.6.x which contains further > revisions made by Sarathy. Though all of us know by know, how will this influence your path towards 5.6.3 and on. Making new and new and new branches is NOT a good idea. Will we just go on on rsyncing from 5.6.2? > Its URL is rsync://ftp.linux.activestate.com/perl-5.6.2/ . > > Expect this last patch to be seen in ten or fifteen minutes at most. -- H.Merijn Brand Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/) using perl-5.6.1, 5.8.0, & 5.9.x, and 806 on HP-UX 10.20 & 11.00, 11i, AIX 4.3, SuSE 8.2, and Win2k. http://www.cmve.net/~merijn/ http://archives.develooper.com/daily-build@perl.org/ perl-qa@perl.org send smoke reports to: smokers-reports@perl.org, QA: http://qa.perl.orgThread Previous | Thread Next