Re: Smoke [5.9.0] 21474 FAIL(F) darwin 6.8 (darwin/1 cpu)

At 2003-10-20 22:39:28 +0200, slaven@rezic.de wrote:
>
> I think it's better to test for the real cause of the failures

Let's see how that theory works.
Thanks, applied. (#21663)

-- ams

• [ID 20000321.047] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 +v5.6.0-RC3 onsun4-solaris-thread-64int 2.7 (UNINSTALLED) by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: Smoke [5.9.0] 21474 FAIL(F) darwin 6.8 (darwin/1 cpu) by Rafael Garcia-Suarez
• Re: Smoke [5.9.0] 21474 FAIL(F) darwin 6.8 (darwin/1 cpu) by Abe Timmerman
• Re: Smoke [5.9.0] 21474 FAIL(F) darwin 6.8 (darwin/1 cpu) by Slaven Rezic
• Re: Smoke [5.9.0] 21474 FAIL(F) darwin 6.8 (darwin/1 cpu) by Abe Timmerman
• Re: Smoke [5.9.0] 21474 FAIL(F) darwin 6.8 (darwin/1 cpu) by Rafael Garcia-Suarez
• Re: Smoke [5.9.0] 21474 FAIL(F) darwin 6.8 (darwin/1 cpu) by Slaven Rezic
• Re: Smoke [5.9.0] 21474 FAIL(F) darwin 6.8 (darwin/1 cpu) by Abhijit Menon-Sen