On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 08:39:56PM -0800, Ilya Zakharevich wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 08:30:21PM -0800, Michael G Schwern wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 08:07:25PM -0800, Ilya Zakharevich wrote: > > > On OS/2 File::Copy::copy would not overwrite by default. Thus some > > > files may not be updated by `make install'. > > > Shouldn't that be fixed instead of hacking around it? > > What is there to fix? Sometimes one behaviour is what is desired, > sometimes another. Given that it is not documented what behaviour is > the default, I see nothing to fix. Ok, we can change it and document it. :) Whether or not File::Copy overwrites by default doesn't strike me as being very platform specific. Smells more like a bug or an unconsidered consequence of using an OS/2 library call to copy files. Can you pass some flag to DosCopy to make it overwrite or unlink the destination file beforehand? -- Michael G Schwern schwern@pobox.com http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ Let me check my notes. http://www.sluggy.comThread Previous | Thread Next