Re: [PATCH bleadperl] (was Re: Is this brokenness in $< $( $> & $) ?)

Rick Delaney wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 03:24:13PM -0500, Rick Delaney wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 04:53:11PM +0000, Alan Burlison wrote:
> > > 
> > > According to the setreuid/setregid manpages, the first parameter (real 
> > > uid/gid) should be -1 to specify 'no change'.
> > 
> > Does the following patch work for you?
> 
> Probably not since it's filled with stupidities.  Try this instead.

Thanks, applied to blead as change #21614.

> --- pp_hot.c.orig	Mon Oct 27 14:49:30 2003
> +++ pp_hot.c	Mon Oct 27 16:14:00 2003

• Is this brokenness in $< $( $> & $) ? by Alan Burlison
• [PATCH bleadperl] (was Re: Is this brokenness in $< $( $> & $) ?) by Rick Delaney
• Re: [PATCH bleadperl] (was Re: Is this brokenness in $< $( $> & $) ?) by Alan Burlison
• Re: [PATCH bleadperl] (was Re: Is this brokenness in $< $( $> & $) ?) by Rick Delaney
• Re: [PATCH bleadperl] (was Re: Is this brokenness in $< $( $> & $) ?) by Rafael Garcia-Suarez
• Re: [PATCH bleadperl] (was Re: Is this brokenness in $< $( $> & $) ?) by Rick Delaney
• Re: Is this brokenness in $< $( $> & $) ? by Rick Delaney