On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 01:24:55AM +0000, Dave Mitchell wrote: > In the case of _DELETE calling _FETCH this doesn't happen, so my patch > does this manually. I don't know if this is the best solution, but it > seems to work. Is the previous bit good for maint now? (considering that we are close to release?) This bit seems safe: > While I was at it, I've integrated the extra ENTER/SAVETMPS calls into > the SHARED_CONTEXT marcos, so that the limited leak protection afforded by > my earlier patches is now enjoyed all all places within shared context. Nicholas ClarkThread Previous | Thread Next