Re: [PATCH bleadperl] (was Re: Is this brokenness in $< $( $> & $) ?)

Rick Delaney wrote:

> Does the following patch work for you?  Note that lines 1088 and 1123
> (the very last changed line) are not related to your issue but were
> obviously wrong before (unless I'm totally misreading things).

I've applied your patch to 5.8.2 RC1 and yes, it does fix the problem.  Many 
thanks :-)

-- 
Alan Burlison
--

• Is this brokenness in $< $( $> & $) ? by Alan Burlison
• [PATCH bleadperl] (was Re: Is this brokenness in $< $( $> & $) ?) by Rick Delaney
• Re: [PATCH bleadperl] (was Re: Is this brokenness in $< $( $> & $) ?) by Alan Burlison
• Re: [PATCH bleadperl] (was Re: Is this brokenness in $< $( $> & $) ?) by Rick Delaney
• Re: [PATCH bleadperl] (was Re: Is this brokenness in $< $( $> & $) ?) by Rafael Garcia-Suarez
• Re: [PATCH bleadperl] (was Re: Is this brokenness in $< $( $> & $) ?) by Rick Delaney
• Re: Is this brokenness in $< $( $> & $) ? by Rick Delaney