On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 06:36:54PM -0700, Jan Dubois <jand@ActiveState.com> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 18:12:22 -0700, Gurusamy Sarathy > <gsar@ActiveState.com> wrote: > > >On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:42:22 PDT, Michael G Schwern wrote: > >>I'd tend to agree, the line between win32.c and libwin32 seems artificial. > >>It also looks like libwin32 is practically a necessity to get anything > >>interesting done on Win32. What say, Jarkko of Borg and Sarathy of State? > > > >I don't think all of libwin32 belongs in the core. The parts that > >are documented in Win32.pod should certainly be added to the core, > >as we've discussed in the past: > > > > http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2003-01/msg00381.html > > > >I haven't seen any patches, though. > > I can look into moving Win32.pm/Win32.xs (but nothing else) into the core. > This should happen *after* 5.8.1 and libwin32 0.20 have been released. > Hectic patching right now will just create a mess. Any progress on this?