Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from October 2003
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:34:32PM -0700, Gisle Aas <gisle@activestate.com> wrote: > Abigail <abigail@abigail.nl> writes: > > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 10:20:48AM -0700, Jan Dubois wrote: > > > > > > Not to me. I consider 5.8.2 a "milestone", so only releases at or after > > > that milestone should be labeled 5.8.2. Everything before that is 5.8.1 > > > with local patches. I think only RCs should have the new version number, > > > all dev snapshots/builds should use the previous one. > > > > So, what should 'print $]' in the current bleadperl print, considering > > that 5.9.0 isn't out yet. 5.8.0? 5.8.1? > > The easy fix seems to just "release" the current bleadperl as 5.9.0. That's no fix. When 5.9.0 is released, I want to be able to install it. As soon as a few more changes are applied, I want to be able to install that as 5.9.1-tobe. This especially applies since the plan is to add Module::Build and CPANPLUS once 5.9.0 is out and it will be difficult to meaningfully try those out without having that perl installed.Thread Previous | Thread Next