Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from October 2003
The short answer (IMHO) is yes. We can create new severities or other customizations to make this easier, if necessary. > Should perlbug be usable for tracking enhancements? (I'm thinking > primarily of patches that are more-or-less complete but need some > feedback or reflection before being applied.) > > I know one or more people have gotten the feeling that patches that > aren't immediately applied just languish forever. I had thought > of suggesting using perlbug to send in patches for better long-term > tracking (e.g. perl #12345 is waiting to see how perl6 solves the same > problem, patch #23456 is dependent on a separate change being applied > first) , but am not sure that fits perlbug's mission in life. There > is severity=wishlist but that doesn't actually indicate a non-bug.Thread Previous