Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from October 2003
Iain 'Spoon' Truskett (via RT) wrote:
>
> I believe the original wording is wrong. It's talking about the wrong
> part of the expression, or is just talking about something that's not
> there..
I think the original wording talks about the {PIPE} part... looks OK to me.
> --- lib/strict.pm~ 2003-10-12 18:52:02.000000000 +1000
> +++ lib/strict.pm 2003-10-12 18:54:58.000000000 +1000
> @@ -108,21 +108,21 @@
>
> =item C<strict subs>
>
> This disables the poetry optimization, generating a compile-time error if
> you try to use a bareword identifier that's not a subroutine, unless it
> is a simple identifier (no colons) and that it appears in curly braces or
> on the left hand side of the C<< => >> symbol.
>
> use strict 'subs';
> $SIG{PIPE} = Plumber; # blows up
> - $SIG{PIPE} = "Plumber"; # just fine: bareword in curlies always ok
> + $SIG{PIPE} = "Plumber"; # just fine: quoted string is always ok
> $SIG{PIPE} = \&Plumber; # preferred form
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next