On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 11:50:34AM +0200, Johan Vromans wrote: > [Quoting Nicholas Clark, on October 7 2003, 10:37, in "Re: Perl an Apache p"] > > In which case if someone is going to contact them, I think that it would > > be good to mention the consistent inconsistency in TCL > > I think it boils down to the question: what is best for Perl? To be > named an Apache project has it positive sides, too. With that, I disagree. I already find that there's a continuous battle going with people who consider Perl a weblanguage. Perl is far more than a weblanguage - it being mentioned as an Apache project doesn't promote the idea that Perl is more than a weblanguage IMO. I don't like the idea of Microsoft, IBM or GNU mentioning Perl as one of their projects - and neither do I like the idea of Apache mentioning Perl as one of their projects. AbigailThread Previous | Thread Next