Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from October 2003
Abigail wrote: > > If someone writes a patch to disallow blessing into the class '0', > I wouldn't oppose it (and I guess the case is edgy enough it doesn't > need a deprecation cycle), but until then, I think the documentation > should be correct. And I'd think that 5.8.2 should just have the doc > patch, not the bless patch to be. What about making C<ref bless [], 0> return "main::0" ? It's a true value and it's a correct package name. And with that the documentation can be restored to its previous state if you like. (although I prefer stating clearly that ref() returns an empty string; I don't know why, I thought that ref(undef) was undefined.)Thread Previous | Thread Next