develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from October 2003

Re: [PATCH pod/perlfunc.pod] ref can return false on references

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
schwern
Date:
October 6, 2003 13:33
Subject:
Re: [PATCH pod/perlfunc.pod] ref can return false on references
Message ID:
20031006133245.K20960@ttul.org
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 09:59:52PM +0200, Abigail wrote:
> It's not a matter of having an Acme module. It's a matter of how Perl
> has been working for a long time, and works right now.

I'm all for backwards compatibility, but programmer convenience and language
clarify should clearly win out over the edge-case this time.


> If someone writes a patch to disallow blessing into the class '0',
> I wouldn't oppose it (and I guess the case is edgy enough it doesn't
> need a deprecation cycle), but until then, I think the documentation
> should be correct. And I'd think that 5.8.2 should just have the doc
> patch, not the bless patch to be.

I agree with that, it should wait for 5.10.


Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About