Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from September 2003
maint @ 21116
Thread Next
From:
Jarkko Hietaniemi
Date:
September 8, 2003 15:47
Subject:
maint @ 21116
Message ID:
20030908224720.GC15469@vipunen.hut.fi
Okay, this shall be known as the Three Snapshot Day... it's the
same day for me, still.
http://www.iki.fi/jhi/perl@21116.tbz
http://www.iki.fi/jhi/perl@21116.tgz
(or rsync -avz --delete ftp.linux.activestate.com::perl-5.8.x perl-5.8.x)
This is also the code freeze for RC5, with one exception [1]. Other
than that, from now on only doc patches, or patches that retract a
recent patch. If you had beautiful patches that were almost ready,
that's just tough.
(I did sneak in the void-map patch as the final big patch.)
Unless someone comes up with a feasible explanation and solution for
the newly failing join.t tests, I will just bluntly remove the new
tests. Yes, this might be just hiding a real failure. At this point,
I don't care.
I am also very probably going to drop the de0.t from the maint: the
test has proven itself to be an unportable pain. I don't want to see
false failures.
[1] Schwern had two patches in mind one week ago, then he quickly
disappeared... If he shows up within 24 hours or so, and the patches
do not not look too big, the patches can go in. The other patch was
about MakeMaker, and there is currently a workaround for it, so it's
not urgent, and I need to be convinced. The other patch was about
Test::More::is_deeply(), and IIRC Fergal Daly knew something about it.
Updates since the last:
____________________________________________________________________________
[ 21115] By: jhi on 2003/09/08 21:20:04
Log: Integrate:
[ 21112]
Retract #21096, mostly: I had misexplained the situation
to Scott A. Crosby. What would be really bad would be
being able to see the hash values of hash keys; but seeing
the seed value while not good for the ultimate paranoia
viewpoint is not that bad, as long as the users are fully
aware of the dangers of disclosing the hash seed.
So hash_seed() is okay.
[ 21113]
Subject: [PATCH] silence 1 compiler warning
From: Nicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 23:04:45 +0100
Message-ID: <20030908230445.E30881@plum.flirble.org>
Branch: maint-5.8/perl
!> lib/Hash/Util.pm lib/Hash/Util.t pod/perlrun.pod universal.c
____________________________________________________________________________
[ 21114] By: jhi on 2003/09/08 21:17:45
Log: Integrate:
[ 21062]
Subject: [PATCH] honoring void context for map()
From: Tassilo von Parseval <tassilo.parseval@post.rwth-aachen.de>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 11:13:41 +0200
Message-id: <20030904091341.GA30655@ethan>
Branch: maint-5.8/perl
!> pp_ctl.c
____________________________________________________________________________
[ 21111] By: jhi on 2003/09/08 21:01:25
Log: Integrate:
[ 21109]
Subject: [PATCH] configpm: about 1.5K less per thread
From: Elizabeth Mattijsen <liz@dijkmat.nl>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 23:58:34 +0200
Message-Id: <p05111b21bb829c68b496@[192.168.56.4]>
[ 21110]
Urk. unique, not shared.
Branch: maint-5.8/perl
!> configpm
____________________________________________________________________________
[ 21108] By: jhi on 2003/09/08 20:51:14
Log: Integrate:
[ 21105]
Regen perlapi.
[ 21106]
A version of change #21073 that works.
[ 21107]
Subject: [PATCH] warnings.pl: each thread 10K smaller
From: Elizabeth Mattijsen <liz@dijkmat.nl>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 22:22:38 +0200
Message-Id: <p05111b16bb827ce551da@[192.168.56.4]>
Branch: maint-5.8/perl
!> ext/PerlIO/scalar/scalar.xs ext/PerlIO/t/scalar.t
!> lib/warnings.pm pod/perlapi.pod warnings.pl
____________________________________________________________________________
[ 21104] By: jhi on 2003/09/08 20:22:21
Log: Integrate:
[ 21103]
Radu Greab is my hero.
Branch: maint-5.8/perl
!> pp_sys.c
____________________________________________________________________________
[ 21102] By: jhi on 2003/09/08 19:43:33
Log: Update Changes.
Branch: maint-5.8/perl
! Changes patchlevel.h
____________________________________________________________________________
--
Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi@iki.fi> http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ "There is this special
biologist word we use for 'stable'. It is 'dead'." -- Jack Cohen
Thread Next
-
maint @ 21116
by Jarkko Hietaniemi