Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from August 2003
On Thu 28 Aug 2003 12:33, "H.Merijn Brand" <h.m.brand@hccnet.nl> wrote: > Tim Some warnings, and I think the error is related to the `thingy' > I addressed in the Cygwin remarks some time ago. Should I test 1.38? > DBI-1.37 FAIL Notes 2 Yes, I should :/ (I missed the announcement in the Sobig avalange) Fixed spurious t/03handles failure on 64bit perls reported by H.Merijn Brand. Builds clean now. All tests successful, 9 tests skipped. Files=34, Tests=1219, 67 wallclock secs (58.06 cusr + 3.65 csys = 61.71 CPU) Sorry for the noise. -- H.Merijn Brand Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/) using perl-5.6.1, 5.8.0, & 5.9.x, and 806 on HP-UX 10.20 & 11.00, 11i, AIX 4.3, SuSE 8.2, and Win2k. http://www.cmve.net/~merijn/ http://archives.develooper.com/daily-build@perl.org/ perl-qa@perl.org send smoke reports to: smokers-reports@perl.org, QA: http://qa.perl.orgThread Previous | Thread Next