On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 01:40:15PM +0100, Ed Avis wrote: > >> Subject: Re: Tie::RefHash: use hash refs as keys in nested hashes > >>- From: Edward Avis <epa98@doc.ic.ac.uk> > >>+ From: Edward Avis > >>+ (address now ed@membled.com) > >> Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 15:24:30 +0000 (GMT) > >> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0011021516010.8344-100000@texel03.doc.ic.ac.uk> > > >For historical purposes, I believe the Change logs should be left > >using the address which was used at the time. Rewriting history > >makes it much harder to go back and find the original message. > > OK. You could add the extra line giving the new address - it should > be obvious that it's not part of the original headers. Bad precedent. It would be a maintenance nightmare if we put in address changes to their change log entries for every porter. Don't worry, we'll find you. We know where you live. ;) -- Michael G Schwern schwern@pobox.com http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ 1. It Has To Work. -- RFC 1925