On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Michael G Schwern wrote: >> Subject: Re: Tie::RefHash: use hash refs as keys in nested hashes >>- From: Edward Avis <epa98@doc.ic.ac.uk> >>+ From: Edward Avis >>+ (address now ed@membled.com) >> Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 15:24:30 +0000 (GMT) >> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0011021516010.8344-100000@texel03.doc.ic.ac.uk> >For historical purposes, I believe the Change logs should be left >using the address which was used at the time. Rewriting history >makes it much harder to go back and find the original message. OK. You could add the extra line giving the new address - it should be obvious that it's not part of the original headers. -- Ed Avis <ed@membled.com>