Re: [perl #10030] DESTROY not called on code reference objects

>>>>> "Kurt" == Kurt Starsinic <kstar@cpan.org> writes:

Kurt>     It seems very strange to me to say that an anonymous sub with
Kurt> no private variables is "not a closure."  Is not the (shorthand)
Kurt> definition of a closure "a subroutine, associated with all its 
Kurt> bindings," even when "all" == 0?

Well, we need a term for that then.  I've been adovcating "closure"
as when "all > 0", whether named or anonymous.

But if you have a better term (that doesn't take more than three
words) for the subroutines that generate a different CV when created
as opposed to those that don't, I'm all for it.

If "all subroutines are closures", then the term loses its usefulness
within the Perl world.

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!

• Re: [perl #10030] DESTROY not called on code reference objects by Dave Mitchell
• [perl #3306] DESTROY not called on code reference objects by Olivier Mengué via RT
• Re: [perl #3306] DESTROY not called on code reference objects by Zefram
• Re: [perl #10030] DESTROY not called on code reference objects by Michael G Schwern
• Re: [perl #10030] DESTROY not called on code reference objects by Dave Mitchell
• Re: [perl #10030] DESTROY not called on code reference objects by Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
• Re: [perl #10030] DESTROY not called on code reference objects by Simon Cozens
• Re: [perl #10030] DESTROY not called on code reference objects by Chip Salzenberg
• Re: [perl #10030] DESTROY not called on code reference objects by Nicholas Clark
• Re: [perl #10030] DESTROY not called on code reference objects by Dave Mitchell
• Re: [perl #10030] DESTROY not called on code reference objects by Arthur Bergman
• Re: [perl #10030] DESTROY not called on code reference objects by Dave Mitchell
• Re: [perl #10030] DESTROY not called on code reference objects by Kurt Starsinic
• Re: [perl #10030] DESTROY not called on code reference objects by Chip Salzenberg
• Re: [perl #10030] DESTROY not called on code reference objects by Dave Mitchell
• Re: [perl #10030] DESTROY not called on code reference objects by merlyn
• Re: [perl #10030] DESTROY not called on code reference objects by Kurt Starsinic
• Re: [perl #10030] DESTROY not called on code reference objects by Arthur Bergman
• Re: [perl #10030] DESTROY not called on code reference objects by Dave Mitchell
• Re: [perl #10030] DESTROY not called on code reference objects by Nick Ing-Simmons
• Re: [perl #10030] DESTROY not called on code reference objects by Dave Mitchell