Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from August 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Moin,
On Monday 18 August 2003 23:21, Ken Williams wrote:
> On Monday, August 18, 2003, at 04:13 PM, Tels wrote:
> > The patch in question is 20746, by yours truly, and can be viewed here:
> > @@ -657,7 +656,7 @@
> >
> > # Figure out the effective $base and clean it up.
> > if ( !defined( $base ) || $base eq '' ) {
> > - - $base = cwd();
> > + $base = $self->cwd();
> > }
>
> In general this is the right way to go - much better to provide a
> consistent cwd() method than to use various piecemeal code to get it.
>
> I'm doing a little cwd-oriented cleanup of the File::Spec::* stuff in
> maintperl, will have patch shortly.
I meant, that probably this change "broke" something. Because if you call
$self->cwd();
then the first argument to cwd is $self, vs:
cwd();
where there are no arguments. However, without looking in the code, I don't
know whether this makes a difference or not.
You might also look into my orginal mails:
http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2003-07/msg00366.html
http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2003-07/msg00362.html
Best wishes,
Tels
Btw: Regarding the Ownership of File::Spec:
I, for one, welcome our new File::Spec Overlord!
:-)
- --
Signed on Mon Aug 18 23:31:14 2003 with key 0x93B84C15.
PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email.
"Not King yet."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)
Comment: When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.
iQEVAwUBP0FHbXcLPEOTuEwVAQGa3gf9EgzofLcBwETmhzQaJ73jiIOWsIkyBDKx
MZJmCaxNl/7ZyuSrkTvT8IR0oH/k3ArkggVYCpp2lmHwqRP7IcUhGrdjfEIyHZAF
mUQshpuzDLWz3rLv37mKwdN1BBfhHwknGrH8U/dLaz2IUefHNW8TG/bd4aUTsHms
TTkvv+WvEumXNK5CU7ah7cnyEK+hxwk6EGe1FCg/62f4bg3omnADPuNdgz+jECbO
UfnGmJ8Qv+W0sE78r8LAXeTpBG5hjnRhPS6N61eea1mCDy4w+ArxGuHdJkhQqCBV
CZT2OiIpoAhPnTdszXD4xzSsRvOqrlIMzGbSJU+kVXMbcPoKGv/XVQ==
=y5gU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----