On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 05:27:51PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote: > On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 11:07:15PM +0100, Dave Mitchell wrote: > > Simon mentions that "either the documentation or the code are wrong". > > Since it would be inefficient to fix, and since closureless anon subs > > are more common that blessed coderefs (I would speculate), I think it > > should be documented as a misfeature. [snip] > Don't document bugs as features. You will hate yourself in the morning. Note that I used the word 'misfeature' rather than 'feature'. So I was suggesting to document it as "this may not work, and it may change in future, so don't rely on it". -- In my day, we used to edit the inodes by hand. With magnets.Thread Previous | Thread Next